🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.