🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.